TenneT - insurance broker services

Eignungskriterien

• • •Acceptance of TenneT General terms and conditions of purchase
  • •General Terms and Conditions of Purchase (GTCP) and Special Terms of Purchase Order for Services of TenneT TSO GmbH form the basis of this request for proposals and will become part of the contract after the bid is awarded.
  • •General terms and conditions of pruchase of TenneT TSO GmbH are published here
  • •Special Terms of Purchase Order for Services of TenneT TSO GmbH are published here
  • •Applicant accepts these provisions.

• Information on the Applicant / Member of the consortium Information on the Applicant/Member of the Bidding Consortium Submission of a document showing the bidder's complete information. In the case of a bidding consortium, each member must submit the relevant information. The information includes in particular

  • •full name, legal representatives, full address, internet address, contact person incl. telephone number and e-mail address. Please use the provided form A1.
  • •The application as a bidding consortium is admitted. A bidding consortium is treated like an individual applicant (Section 50 § 2 SektVO). If applicants are addressed in the tender documents, this also refers to the joint form of participation of a bidding consortium. In this respect, regulations which specifically are related to bidding consortia, exclusively use the term "Bidding Consortium." The bidding consortium shall nominate an authorized representative for the conclusion and implementation of the contract and who signs form A1. The authorized representative shall be available to the contracting entity as the contact person of the bidding consortium in this tendering procedure. Members of the bidding consortium shall jointly complete the form "Statement of Bidding Consortium", which also names the authorized representative.

• Extract of commercial register Please provide a proof of registration in a commercial register of the relevant authority of the country in which the company is established (E.g. Kamer van Koophandel (NL), Handelsregister (DE), Companies house (UK)) , which may not be older than twelve months at the expiry of the call for competition period. Note regarding the formation of a consortium

  In the case of a consortium, proof must be provided by each member of the applicant group.

• • •Insurance broker license / Compliance with IDD Directive 2016/97/EU)
  • •The applicant is a registered insurance broker and licenced to operate in both The Netherlands and Germany and confirms its compliance to all requirements of Directive (EU) 2016/97 on Insurance Distribution (IDD) as transposed into national law.
  • •Therefore insurance broker must hold a valid insurance intermediary licence in Germany (§34d GewO), the Netherlands (Wft – Wet op het financieel toezicht) or a comparable European licence.
  • •The applicant confirms that it is authorized to provide the requested services for the contracting authority’s entities in Germany and the Netherlands.
  • •Please provide a license to operate as insurance broker.

• Company organization Please upload a brief overview of your organization, highlighting the key aspects relevant to the subject of the request for proposals. This overview should include at least the following information

  • •Number of employees
  • •Financial metrics / Revenue
  • •Relevant company locations
  • •Company organizational chart
  • •Note regarding consortia:
  • •In the case of a consortium, this overview does not refer to each individual company, but rather to the organization within the consortium.

• Self-declaration of no grounds for exclusion Note from the Contracting Authority

  • •Economic operators interested in the contract must declare whether any grounds for exclusion apply to them. The following exclusion provisions under public procurement law must be observed:
  • •- § 123 GWB
  • •- § 124 GWB
  • •Please find an English version of this law under the following link: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gwb/englisch_gwb.html#p1314
  • •☐ None of the grounds for exclusion contained in the above-mentioned provisions apply to me / us
  • •☐ In particular, no insolvency proceedings or comparable legally regulated proceedings have been opened or applied for. Likewise, no corresponding application has been rejected due to lack of assets. Furthermore, there is no confirmation from the insolvency administrator regarding the legally binding confirmation of an insolvency plan (Section 258 InsO)
  • •☐ The company is not in liquidation.

Zuschlagskriterien

• Price: The tender includes a price sheet as an attachment. The bidder submits the prices on the price sheet. The formats are fixed and the same for all bidders. Under this award criterion, the total price is evaluated. This is indicated as a total on the price sheet. The bid with the lowest bid price (= “best price”) receives the full points for this criterion. The bid prices of the remaining bids are linearly interpolated and compared to the lowest bid price. Bid prices that exceed the threshold of 200% of the lowest bid price are awarded 0 points.

• Methodology & Scope of Work

  • •Evaluation of Methodology and scope of work, including team, broking + market access, policy management, claims management.
  • •Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst:
  • •• 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree
  • •• 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly
  • •• 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies
  • •• 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly.
  • •• 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly.
  • •Minimum quality requirements:
  • •Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

• Innovation & improvements

  • •Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst:
  • •• 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree
  • •• 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly
  • •• 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies
  • •• 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly.
  • •• 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly.
  • •Minimum quality requirements:
  • •Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

• Reporting, KPI, Transition, SLA

  • •Evaluation of reporting, KPI, transition and SLA
  • •Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst:
  • •• 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree
  • •• 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly
  • •• 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies
  • •• 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly.
  • •• 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly.
  • •Minimum quality requirements:
  • •Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.